What’s in a Name?
What is a vegetable, really? While the true meaning of the word has been argued for some time now, and culinary professionals define their foods a little differently than botanists or even customs officials, we all know the tomato has long been a candidate up for semantic debate.
In 1893, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a customs case that the tomato is considered a vegetable, despite the knowledgeable conclusion of numerous botanists that a tomato (as well as corn, cucumber and bell pepper) is actually a fruit. This all stems (get it?!) from the scientific taxonomy of biological classification, but my point is that it has definitively been decided by the USDA how many servings of vegetables Americans should be getting a day, and what these vegetables are is also, apparently, up the United States Government.
But First, a Little History
The National School Lunch Program was signed by President Truman and established in 1946. The program came into effect because it became evident that malnourished children grew up to be very poor soldiers; this federally imposed meal program was imposed as a “matter of national security”.
In 1966 the program went even further by passing the Child Nutrition Act to provide breakfast, milk, and special equipment for the school kitchens. The success experienced as a result of the National School Lunch Program inspired officials as they began to recognize the role of proper nutrition for brain development in our nations’s children.
However, this crusade seemed to lose momentum in the early 1980’s when the Federal School Lunch Program withstood a staggering budget cut of 25%. This led to a number of decreases in quality and quantity, including substitutions and portion reductions. The USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service under the Reagan Administration actually encouraged states to explore such audacious options such as pickle relish as vegetable substitutions. Not surprisingly, this campaign, and Reagan himself were publicly smeared with the critique that condiments are not vegetables.
So… Can Pizza Actually Be a Vegetable?
This brings me to more current regulations. Many people probably remember the public outrage in 2011 when the agricultural spending bill passed that failed to honor the attempts to enhance the nutritional content of school lunches. The proposed changes included several things like limiting sodium and potato use on the lunch lines, and not counting 1/8th of a cup of tomato paste as a 1/2 a cup of vegetables. In other words, in order to get their full cup of veggies, kids will have to consume however much cheese and bread comes along with that tomato paste in the sauce. This lead to slew of headlines claiming that “Congress Declared Pizza a Vegetable”.
Perhaps unfortunately for the general public, policies that are made in the name of nutrition are not always done so solely with the objective consideration and input of trained professionals. Things like cost and subsidies come into account when making these decisions, too. Dairy, meat and salt industries have a say in how much of these things we “should” actually eat. For instance, knowledge about the dangers of excessive sodium consumption have been abound for 30 or more years, but it’s been difficult to get the reduction many health professionals have been asking for, as salt is an efficient and cost-effective way to make food taste good, so the salt industry actually has a powerful sway.
Back to the Tomato and Our School Lunches
Fresh fruits and veggies are pretty easily recognized by most anyone over the age of 4. However, some regulations and public policies make it a little more ambiguous as to how to count your servings. In light of these facts, the position of public policy for someone passionately interested in good food seems daunting and disheartening.
While there are community nutrition positions in government, it seems that fierce politicians rarely graduate from the nation’s dietetics and nutrition programs to go on a fight for nutritional legislature. Many big industries and companies seek out professionals who will lobby for their product, without giving an objective look at the nutritional value of their goods. However, without the nutritional advocacy of educated, unbiased professionals, our children would be very much at the mercy of budget cuts and the food industries, who quite frankly, don’t always have the nutritional content of our school lunches in mind. Without them, the future’s children may be scraping their “vegetables” from the inside of a salty can…
My gratitude goes out to those who fight for our nutritional standards, with our most healthy best interests at heart.